US Supreme Court rejects Seattle wage law challenge

US Supreme Court rejects business groups' request to challenge Seattle minimum wage law.

Photo by: Reuters (Archive)
Photo by: Reuters (Archive)

The Supreme Court stands in Washington May 18, 2015.

The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge by business groups to a trendsetting Seattle law that will raise the city's minimum wage to $15 an hour, leaving in place a lower court's decision to uphold the ordinance.

The law, which took effect in April 2015, requires businesses in Seattle with more than 500 employees nationwide to raise their minimum wage to $15 by 2018. Smaller companies have until 2021 to do so.

People celebrate the passage of the minimum wage for fast-food workers by the New York State Fast Food Wage Board during a rally in New York July 22, 2015.

Seattle was the first major US city to commit to such a high basic wage amid pressure from unions and workers' rights groups. The move has since been followed to varying degrees by cities such as San Francisco and Los Angeles as well as by state lawmakers in California and New York.

A woman stands outside the building where California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill hiking California's minimum wage to $15 by 2023 in Los Angeles, California, United States, April 4, 2016.

The International Franchise Association's 2014 lawsuit took issue with the Seattle law's treatment of local franchises as subsidiaries of brand parents such as McDonald's or Burger King rather than independent businesses, meaning they had to comply by the earlier deadline.

People protest for a $15-an-hour nationwide minimum wage in Los Angeles, California, United States, April 14, 2016.

Seattle officials and the Service Employees International Union, which backed the city in the case, said franchises are not typical small businesses because franchising offers inherent advantages such as access to loans, brand recognition and bulk purchasing. But the franchise association countered that those perks come at a cost, namely royalties, fees and rent. A federal judge in Seattle in March 2015 rejected claims that the ordinance was discriminatory, and the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals last year agreed.

The association said the lawsuit was an attempt "to level the playing field" for the 600 franchise businesses that employ 19,000 people in Seattle, and it was disappointed with the court's action.

"Seattle's ordinance is blatantly discriminatory and affirmatively harms hard-working franchise small business owners every day since it has gone into effect," the group's president, Robert Cresanti, said in a statement.

The case is International Franchise Association v. City of Seattle, US Supreme Court, No. 15-958.

TRTWorld, Reuters