A series of bombs hit Syria’s north-eastern city of Aleppo last month, killing 338 civilians, including 100 children. Soon after, the United Kingdom accused Moscow of committing war crimes for having deployed bunker busters in Syria.
It’s a bomb that penetrates deep into the ground. As it explodes, destroying underground shelters and hideouts, the shock waves flatten surrounding structures — even those buildings as tall as New York's Empire State Building.
When and where can you use them in a war?
The Geneva Conventions spell out that heavy duty bombs like bunker busters could only be used in “extreme circumstance of self-defence.” Dropping them in civilian neighbourhoods is strictly prohibited and perceived as inhumane.
Who else has used bunker busters, and why?
At the height of Gulf War I, US fighter jets struck an underground shelter for civilians in Iraq’s Amririyah city, killing 400 people.
A decade later, the US again invaded Iraq and its bomber jets heavily pounded Baghdad with bunker busters. American officials said that they were using the weapon to hit underground command centres of the Iraqi army and bring the war to a quick end.
But a year later, Human Rights Watch contested that claim, saying the bombings “resulted in dozens of civilian casualties that the US could have prevented if it had taken additional precautions.”
Israel also unleashed similar violence in Palestine’s Gaza Strip in 2014. It air dropped bunker busting bombs in dense urban neighbourhoods, destroying several dozen apartment buildings and killing a middle-aged woman and her newly born child.
How do countries get away with bunker busters?
The states accused of killing civilians with such bombs come up with one common line of defence — that their enemies use civilians as human shields.
In the case of Amiririyah, the US authorities said the civilian shelter was Saddam Hussain’s communications centre in disguise.
In case of Gaza, Israel said that it intended to hit Hamas leader Mohammed Deif but ended up killing his wife and their child.
Similarly, Russia is rebutting the “war crime” accusation saying “extremist groups in eastern Aleppo were holding its population hostage.”
Does anyone care?
The United Nations seems concerned. A top UN official said that its envoys are trying hard to broker a ceasefire with the Russian government and Syrian regime. Plus, it is also working towards holding countries accountable for their acts of aggression against civilians.
“We have asked for the Security Council to refer the situation in Syria to the International Criminal Court, so that the ICC can determine accountability,” Farhan Haq, the deputy spokesperson for the Secretary-General, told TRT World.
Here is a visual explainer on how bunker busters work:
Author: Mehboob Jeelani