US lawmakers battle over migrants crossing border illegally

A day after dozens of parents were reunited with children who had been separated at the US-Mexico border by immigration officials, the US government faces a looming deadline to match another roughly 2,000 children with parents.

People protest immigration separation policies outside the federal court on June 26, 2018 in El Paso, Texas. Cases of children and families seeking refuge were being heard inside the courthouse.
AP

People protest immigration separation policies outside the federal court on June 26, 2018 in El Paso, Texas. Cases of children and families seeking refuge were being heard inside the courthouse.

The fight over US President Donald Trump's abandoned policy of separating migrant families has stirred anew in Congress, drawing fresh attention as the administration struggles to meet the deadline to reunite over 2,000 children taken from their parents.

The migration issue has divided Republicans and is one that Democrats hope will propel voters their way in the midterm elections.

The battling at the House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday underscored how both parties still see vast political potency in immigration, even as congressional votes have shown that partisan differences and divisions within the GOP or Republican Party, make it unlikely anything will reach Trump's desk soon.

Kevin McAleese joins TRT World from Washington.

Loading...

"We have to try to keep it up front as much as we can, because it's important," Representative Jose Serrano said of Democrats' attempts to end family separations. "The whole world is watching on this one. It's not just us."

Republicans on the Appropriations panel batted down Democratic proposals that undercut the administration's "zero-tolerance" policy of prosecuting and detaining migrants caught entering the US. One plan would have blocked money for tent cities to house unaccompanied children.

But in a tacit admission that Trump's actions have left them politically vulnerable, the Republican-controlled committee accepted others. That included one requiring a government plan for tracking and reuniting children separated from their families and imposing a $100,000-a-day fine, imperceptible by federal standards, if it doesn't produce one.

With roughly two dozen Democratic amendments in play, Republicans fired back with one of their own.

Keeping the detentions going 

They won party-line approval of language letting federal officials hold children for more than 20 days when their parents face legal action for unauthorised entry to the US. The Trump administration wants to eliminate that court-imposed 20-day limit so it can detain entire families as it enforces its "zero-tolerance" policy.

"All it does is keep families together while we're in the process of adjudication," said Tom Cole, the measure's sponsor.

Reuters

Thomas Saenz, who argued in favour of the constitutionality of former president Barack Obama's executive action to defer deportation of certain immigrant children and parents who are in the country illegally at the Supreme Court, speaks in Washington, US. April 18, 2016.

Democrats opposed to holding families 

Democrats say the administration should let such families go until they must appear in court, and say keeping children and parents in custody for such offenses is cruel, even if they're together. 

"It trades one abhorrent policy for another," said Rosa DeLauro, a Democrat.

Some Republicans have also opposed the idea of holding families until their cases are resolved.

Senators have been talking behind the scenes in hopes of producing a bipartisan measure aimed at family separation, but so far they've not reported an agreement. House Republicans have been trying to produce a family separation measure they can push through their chamber but also have been unable to so far.

The issue has been overshadowed in recent days by Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement and Trump's nomination of Judge Brett Cavanaugh to replace him on the Supreme Court. But Democrats are showing little interest in letting public attention fade on the separation of families.

The family separations, which have spawned virtually daily doses of heart-rending stories and pictures of weeping children and mothers, give Democrats an opportunity to repeat Trump's denigration of immigrants. Democrats view that as a way to win over moderate voters in suburban swing districts that could determine House control in November.

Immigrant parents who revelled after joyful reunions with their young children spoke on Wednesday of the traumatic impact of being separated from their sons and daughters for months.

The government is holding around 2,000 children apart from their migrant families and in some cases is struggling to reunite them with their parents.

In late June, US District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego set a 14-day deadline to reunite children under five with their parents and a 30-day deadline for older children.

The government began with a list of 102 children potentially eligible to be reunited by the first deadline. But government attorneys have said the administration wouldn't meet the deadline for 20 children under five because it needed more time to track down parents who have already been deported or released into the US.

Meanwhile, Democrat Mark Pocan planned to introduce separate legislation to eliminate ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, whose agents help enforce Trump's policies. Under the bill, which has no chance of passage, a commission would assign its duties to other agencies.

Abolishing the agency has become a campaign rallying cry of activist liberal elements of the Democratic Party. Republicans and some Democrats see the effort as liberal overreach that will let the GOP paint Democratic candidates as extreme.

Route 6