US
5 MIN READ
US House okays bill to reverse Postal Service changes amid voting dispute
With heated debate over mail delays, the House approved legislation in a rare session that would reverse recent changes in US Postal Service operations and send $25 billion to shore up the agency ahead of the November election.
US House okays bill to reverse Postal Service changes amid voting dispute
Protestors wearing face masks rally in support of the United States Postal Service (USPS) outside the Trump International Hotel in Washington, US August 22, 2020. / Reuters

The Democratic-led US House of Representatives has voted to provide the cash-strapped Postal Service with $25 billion and block policy changes that have stirred concerns about mail-in balloting ahead of the November 3 election.

The 257-150 vote on Saturday sent the legislation dubbed the "Delivering for America Act" on to the Republican-controlled Senate. 

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said in a statement that the Senate would "absolutely not pass" the stand-alone bill. The White House also strongly opposes the legislation and has said it would recommend that President Donald Trump veto the measure.

But more than two-dozen House Republicans broke ranks to join Democrats in approving the bill, during a rare Saturday session called by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in the middle of the congressional August recess.

With mail-in voting expected to surge during the coronavirus pandemic, Trump has alarmed Democrats by repeatedly denouncing mail-in ballots as a possible source of fraud. 

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy recently suspended cost-cutting measures that have slowed deliveries in recent weeks.

READ MORE: US Postal Service halts changes blamed for delays after uproar, lawsuits

Electoral advantage?

Democrats, who accuse Trump of trying to discourage mail-in balloting to gain an electoral advantage over Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, cast themselves as defenders of a public that relies on the Postal Service for vital deliveries, including prescription drugs.

"The American people do not want anyone messing with the Post Office. They certainly do not want it to be politicized. They just want their mail, they want their medicines and they want their mail-in ballots delivered in a timely way. And that is exactly what our bill does," said Democratic Representative Carolyn Maloney, who authored the legislation.

Maloney also released a Postal Service document showing an 8 percent slowdown in the processing of first-class mail, most of it occurring after DeJoy became postmaster in June.

Republican leaders denied that the Postal Service was in any danger and criticized Democrats for moving legislation forward before DeJoy could testify at a House hearing slated for Monday.

"This is the result of a legislative process only slightly less absurd than the conspiracies, insinuations, and fabrications that gave rise to the purported need for it," said Republican Representative James Comer.

The 26 Republicans who supported the measure represented more than one in 10 House Republican members. Another 23 Republicans did not vote.

As lawmakers prepared to vote, Trump took to Twitter to accuse Pelosi and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of seeking unnecessary funding for the Postal Service and trying to pull off a "Universal Mail-In Ballot Scam."

"Vote NO to the Pelosi/Schumer money-wasting HOAX which is taking place now," the president wrote.

READ MORE: Pelosi calls House back to block Postal Service changes

Coronavirus pandemic

DeJoy told a Senate committee on Friday that the Postal Service would deliver ballots "securely and on time" in the November election but said bigger changes could come after that.

In fact, the House bill would prevent DeJoy from taking any action that would impede service until after next January or the end of the coronavirus health emergency, whichever comes later.

"Our legislation is not just about the election. It's about - surprise, surprise, Mr. Postmaster General - the coronavirus!" Pelosi told a news conference.

Pelosi insisted that congressional action is necessary, calling DeJoy's assurances ambiguous and unsatisfactory. "His comments are one thing. His actions will be another. And that's why we have this legislation," she said.

She said Trump's attacks on mail-in voting were part of a larger effort to suppress voting that also includes his recent call for law enforcement officers to monitor voting at polling places.

READ MORE: US postal service warns mail-in votes may not be counted on time

SOURCE:Reuters
Explore
Brad Lander secures key New York Democratic primary victory as Micah Lasher defeats Kennedy heir
US Supreme Court backs Trump administration in crucial green card case
US strike on an alleged drug boat kills 2, leaves 6 survivors, in the eastern Pacific Ocean
Why the US doesn't want to lose its grip on the Chagos Islands
US Air Force B-52 bomber crashes in California, killing all 8 on board
Trump celebrates 80th birthday with historic White House cage fight tournament
US House approves $70Bn immigration enforcement funding package
Trump team refuses BBC request for financial records in $10B defamation case: Report
Teen killed, three injured in shooting outside California graduation ceremony, authorities confirm
US warship fire in Middle East may have caused greater damage than Pentagon acknowledged: CNN
Democrats are favoured in 2026 midterms, but is a blue wave guaranteed? Not quite.
Trump inks bill to fund DHS agencies, ending its longest shutdown
Trump says Iran should not have nuclear weapons at state dinner with King Charles III
Former FBI chief Comey charged with threatening Trump's life
Florida governor proposes new US congressional map targeting opposition seats
Cole Tomas Allen charged with attempted Trump assassination
Another Democrat suspends campaign for California governor
US Representative Swalwell says will resign from Congress after sexual misconduct allegations
Tide turning? Americans’ views of Israel, Netanyahu grow negative
Florida governor signs 'terrorist' designation law, raising free speech concerns