Türkiye Suspends Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces Along With NATO Countries
10:19
World
Türkiye Suspends Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces Along With NATO Countries
Earlier this month Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan signed a decree to suspend Ankara's obligations under the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe. Known as the CFE, the treaty was signed in 1990 as the Soviet Union was beginning to unravel. It imposed limits on conventional military equipment in Europe. But Moscow withdrew from the agreement in November saying it does not serve Russia's fundamental security interests. NATO countries, including the US, UK and Germany followed by freezing their participation in the pact. Moscow had previously suspended its participation in the CFE in 2007 before completely withdrawing last year. Russia blamed NATO countries for fueling the Ukraine conflict and embracing Finland and Sweden as new members. Although the reciprocal response from the alliance came with condemnation, the US said the suspension of the treaty's obligations would strengthen NATO's deterrence and defence capacity by removing restrictions which affect military planning. Where does Turkiye stand admist this change, and what impact will the CFE's suspesion have on European security. Strait Talk, hosted by Ayse Suberker, is TRT World’s programme that features in-depth analysis of Türkiye’s role in the world. Guests: Samuel Doveri Vesterbye Managing Director at European Neighbourhood Council Tudor Onea Assistant Professor at Bilkent University
April 16, 2024
More Videos
America’s newest media moguls: the Ellisons
BBC–Trump legal row over ‘misleading’ edit
Yemeni children schooling in tents amid war ruins
Land, trees & lives: Many faces of Israeli occupation
Two nations celebrate 75 years of diplomatic ties
US-India ties on the brink of collapse
A bloody summer: the last 60 days of the Russia-Ukraine war
What’s in Columbia University’s $221M settlement with Trump?
Germany’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian voices
What does Israel have to gain from “protecting” Syria’s Druze?