Survey shows Turkish opinion firmly in favour of Israeli boycott

Areda Survey's findings illuminate the nuanced sentiments of 1,752 participants, underscoring a significant 60.3% agreement with the global movement.

Areda Survey's quantitative research method reveals the multifaceted perspectives within Turkish society. / Photo: AA Archive
AA Archive

Areda Survey's quantitative research method reveals the multifaceted perspectives within Turkish society. / Photo: AA Archive

The popular global movement to boycott companies, brands and products linked with Israel has found widespread, voluntary support among the Turkish public, especially since the occupying country’s murderous campaign against the Palestinian people in Gaza, according to a recent consumer survey.

The findings of Istanbul-based Areda Survey’s comprehensive research initiative, involving 1,752 participants from across Türkiye — to gauge the participation of the Turkish people in the boycott of Israeli products — revealed that 60.3% people agreed with the call to boycott Israeli-related products.

This survey, conducted between November 28 and December 1, 2023, utilised the CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing) technique, a quantitative research method that harnesses the power of online surveys. The results not only shed light on the prevalent sentiment within Türkiye, but also uncovered perceptions of participants regarding the attitudes of the US and Western Europe over human rights.

“As a research company, we take care to address whatever affects or may affect the Turkish public's agenda directly or indirectly. The data we collect is also very important in the sociological interpretation of societies and events. After Israel bombed the hospital in Palestine, we observed that the reactions of Turkish and the world public increased both on digital platforms and on the streets,” says Yusuf Akin, general manager of Areda Survey.

“We wanted to address this observation with our public opinion research. As a result of our research on Israel's occupation of Gaza, we saw that the Turkish people strongly support the Palestinian people,” he adds.

In the realm of human rights advocacy, 86.6% of respondents in the Areda Survey contended that America and Europe exert undue pressure on other States, reflecting a belief that geopolitical dynamics influence human rights discourse. Conversely, a distinct minority, comprising 13.4%, held the view that America and Europe exhibit sincerity and consistency in their approach to human rights matters.

Intricacies of geopolitical dynamics, public sentiments and advocacy efforts converge in this research, offering a snapshot of the nuanced perspectives that exist within Turkish society, and underscores the multifaceted nature of the discourse around the Israeli occupation, and the global responses it has elicited. The survey is evidence of the complexities inherent in navigating issues of international significance, where diverse viewpoints intersect and contribute to shaping the broader narrative.

The survey shows public interest in the conflict rose following Israel's bombing of the Al Shifa hospital, and the ongoing bombing of places of worship, schools and civilian areas. A majority of the Turkish people, who were highly sensitive to the aggression, wanted a resolution within established democratic frameworks, and were disappointed when America and Europe, which always harp on human rights, did not elicit the expected reactions.

Hence, the public gravitated towards the global call to boycott products linked to Israel. It is as if the Turkish consumers are saying in unison: "If you want to sell me something in my country, in my ecosystem, you have to respect my values," says Akin.

As the international community grapples with the decisions of individual states, and their impact on human rights, the survey offers a valuable insight into the public pulse within Türkiye.

The participants, each a thread in the fabric of public opinion, contribute to a broader dialogue on the global stage, shaping the contours of discussions that transcend borders and challenge the status quo.

The research captures a specific moment in time, but also serves as a marker of the ongoing discourse, offering insights into the dynamics that propel movements advocating for justice, accountability and ethical consumption.

Route 6